🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.